A catalogue is not an ecosystem
The number of connectors says little about adoption, reliability, strategic coverage or the cost of keeping them useful.
Expertise · Integration ecosystems
Product strategy, architecture and operating models for third-party connectivity—from the first strategic connectors to portfolios numbering in the hundreds.
Shipping a connector is the start of its lifecycle. External schemas change, credentials expire, rate limits tighten and customers use workflows in ways the original design did not anticipate.
Scaling integrations therefore requires more than reusable code. It needs portfolio choices, explicit ownership, lifecycle policy, observability and a realistic view of where the product should remain opinionated.
What matters
The number of connectors says little about adoption, reliability, strategic coverage or the cost of keeping them useful.
Unclear responsibility for failures, schema changes and support escalations creates more friction than many technical choices.
Shared contracts, tooling and observability should remove repetition while preserving the exceptions that carry product value.
A working framework
The objective is useful coverage with controlled operational complexity, not the largest possible directory.
Start with the jobs that cross system boundaries, not a list of vendors with APIs.
Distinguish strategic, common and long-tail integrations by value, demand and operating model.
Make responsibility for product behavior, connector code, credentials, support and partner coordination explicit.
Use internal development, embedded platforms, partners or customer tooling according to differentiation and lifecycle cost.
Track activation, successful syncs, data freshness, failure recovery and support demand—not just connector availability.
Open to thoughtful conversations
If it involves APIs, integrations, data products or B2B platforms, we would be interested to hear about it.
Email sales@prmhq.com